From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:10:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpg-interface.c: use flags to determine key/signer info presence
Message-ID: <xmqqwoq8ox8w.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181023225605.GB6119@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>

"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Replace the logic used to determine whether key and signer information
>> is present to use explicit flags in sigcheck_gpg_status[] array.  This
>> is more future-proof, since it makes it possible to add additional
>> statuses without having to explicitly update the conditions.
>
> This series looks good to me.  I was going to ask after patch 2 whether
> you were printing the subkey or primary key fingerprint, and then you
> answered my question in patch 3.  Thanks for including both.

Yeah, this looks good to me too.  Thanks, both.