Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] MyFirstObjectWalk: fix description for counting omitted objects
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 25, 2024, 21:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqwmpqgg1g.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <ghplvikrdk.fsf@gouders.net>
Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> "this means that" could be rephrased in a way a bit more helpful and >> to readers with clarity, perhaps: >> >> Note that our object walk will not perform any better than >> an unfiltered walk with this function, because all reachable >> objects need to be walked in order to ... > > Would it be OK to rearrange it even more?
Sure. We are in the business of clarifying this document, so making it easier to read is very much welcomed.