From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:25:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] MyFirstObjectWalk: fix description for counting omitted objects
Message-ID: <xmqqwmpqgg1g.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <ghplvikrdk.fsf@gouders.net>

Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net> writes:

>> "this means that" could be rephrased in a way a bit more helpful and
>> to readers with clarity, perhaps:
>>
>> 	Note that our object walk will not perform any better than
>> 	an unfiltered walk with this function, because all reachable
>> 	objects need to be walked in order to ...
>
> Would it be OK to rearrange it even more?

Sure.  We are in the business of clarifying this document, so making
it easier to read is very much welcomed.