Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2023, #01; Wed, 2)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Aug 7, 2023, 16:19 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqv8dqhlkz.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD2Fw+oGz4VK=_i3B_D_VMQqMoXTJPpXRbkDiWjHciEqJw@mail.gmail.com>

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:

> (Sorry I somehow forgot to put the mailing list in Cc: of this.)

This seems to be a response to an older issue of the report, but I take it that the status of these two topics haven't changed since then.

Show 7 quoted lines

>> > * cc/repack-sift-filtered-objects-to-separate-pack (2023-07-24) 8 commits
>> > ...
>> >  Breaks CI with some environment variables configured.
>> >  cf. <xmqqo7jzh9mh.fsf@gitster.g>
>> >  source: <20230724085909.3831831-1-christian.couder@gmail.com>
>>
>> I am working on this and hope to send a version 4 soon.

Sounds good.  Thanks.

Show 8 quoted lines

>> > * cc/git-replay (2023-06-03) 15 commits
>> > ...
>> >
>> >  What's the status of this thing?
>> >  source: <20230602102533.876905-1-christian.couder@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have a 2 week long vacation starting soon, so I will likely not have
>> time to work on a new round in the next 3 weeks.

OK.  Enjoy.

Show 5 quoted lines

>> However in a recent article
>> (https://github.blog/2023-07-27-scaling-merge-ort-across-github/)
>> GitHub says that they are already using git-replay (though not sure
>> it's this exact version or another one), and GitLab plans to use it
>> too.

So there are plenty folks who are capable of reviewing but they are not interested in giving it to the general public by withholding their reviews ;-)?