Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow building Git with Asciidoctor
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 15, 2014, 17:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqsiipw7ne.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20141015011754.GA131351@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:08:19AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: >> >> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:37:32PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: >> > >> > Specifically I'm not excited about getting into a state where we have to >> > maintain both an asciidoc.conf file _and_ ruby extensions for >> > asciidoctor. I don't mind if somebody wants to step up and keep the >> > asciidoctor bits in sync with the asciidoc.conf, but I feel like one of >> > them needs to be considered the "master". >> >> I do not mind to have the machinery to run AsciiDoctor too much in >> my tree. It may make it easier for those who use it to spot places >> in *.txt that need (in)compatibility workarounds between the two >> formatters than keeping it outside. > > Alternately, I'm happy to be responsible for maintaining the > extensions.rb file.
Let's see how well the patches 3 and 4 work for other people with AsciiDoctor and then decide to go in that direction.
I do not forsee that changes to allow our *.txt to be used with AsciiDoctor interfere with what GitHub folks do with their own documentation toolchain, but I am not sure how the AsciiDoctor specific alternative build infrastructure we would eventually ship would interact with them---maybe they are not affected at all, or maybe they can even take advantage of it.
Thanks.