Re: [RFC 1/3] refspec: fix documentation referring to refspec_item

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Aug 21, 2020, 21:41 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqsgcf7k3s.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+P7+xpew4-ZxcOjuTqq7B3ziYOpNzUWSaTMQLRnxZQPsb1PSA@mail.gmail.com>

Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> writes:

Show 26 quoted lines

> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:18 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> writes:
>>
>> > From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > In commit d27eb356bf25 ("remote: move doc to remote.h and refspec.h")
>> > the documentation for the refspec structure was moved into refspec.h
>> >
>> > This documentation refers to elements of the refspec_item, not the
>> > struct refspec. Move the documentation slightly in order to align it
>> > with the structure it is actually referring to.
>>
>> Makes sense to me.
>>
>
> Hi Junio,
>
> I'm thinking I should send the first two patches a separate
> preparatory series while I follow up with a v2 of the RFC of negative
> refspecs
>
> Does that seem reasonable?
>
> Thanks,
> Jake

Sure; thanks.