Re: [RFC 3/3] refspec: add support for negative refspecs
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 21, 2020, 16:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqr1s09djt.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200821023335.GA3124022@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Yes, I'd agree we should be applying the negative refspecs first, and > then de-duping / looking for collisions. Which I think is what the patch > is doing currently.
Good to see that we thought this through. The reasoning deserves to be recorded somewhere (perhaps a comment just before making the call to apply the negative refspec).
Thanks.