Re: [PATCH] t6006-*.sh: Fix truncation tests
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 20, 2014, 17:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqr43o1ill.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140520141936.GA30187@ashu.dyn1.rarus.ru>
Alexey Shumkin <alex.crezoff@gmail.com> writes:
> AFAIU, Junio already applied my patches (existance of a branch > as/pretty-truncate tells us that). So, we can only send other patches that > fix errors brought with former patches.
No, NO, NOOOOO....
The existence of a branch merely means that I saw the patches, and that I thought that the series was not completely useless. In other words, it indicates that I wanted to make sure that I won't forget about the topic, and it was worth my time to create the branch and apply there for that purpose.
Please do not read anything more than that. Presense of a topic branch by itself does not say that I _read_ the patches or I thought they did not need reroll.
When such a branch is merged to 'next', that means I read the patches myself, or I saw somebody whose judgement I and others in the community trust read them and gave a positive response or an Ack, and that I decided that the topic is in a good enough shape to be worked on further with incremental updates.
You are talking about the latter state, but as/pretty-truncate is in the former state.