Re: [PATCH] t6006-*.sh: Fix truncation tests
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- Date
- May 20, 2014, 16:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <537B8633.602@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140520160213.GA2947@ashu.dyn1.rarus.ru>
On 20/05/14 17:02, Alexey Shumkin wrote:
Show 43 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>> On 20/05/14 15:19, Alexey Shumkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:54:20PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>>
>>>> If you need to re-roll your 'as/pretty-truncate' branch, could
>>>> you please squash the relevant parts of this patch into the
>>>> corresponding patches of your patch series. (ie this is a patch
>>>> against the head of the current pu branch ...).
>>>>
>>>> Without this patch I get:
>>>>
>>>> $ ./t6006-rev-list-format.sh
>>>> ok 1 - setup
>>>> ok 2 - format percent
>>>> ok 3 - format hash
>>>> ok 4 - format tree
>>>> ok 5 - format parents
>>>> ok 6 - format author
>>>> ok 7 - format committer
>>>> ok 8 - format encoding
>>>> ok 9 - format subject
>>>> ./t6006-rev-list-format.sh: 152: ./t6006-rev-list-format.sh: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
>>>> FATAL: Unexpected exit with code 2
>>>> $
>>> Ooops, my fault.
>>>>
>>>> (if you have bash as /bin/sh you get different but related errors).
>>>> The additional quoting suppresses the 'command redirection' errors, etc...
>>> It's strange but I do have Bash as /bin/sh and unfortunately I have no
>>> this error
>>
>> Hmm, I see this:
>>
>> $ bash t6006-rev-list-format.sh -i
> AFAIK, this is not "running Bash as /bin/sh" :)
> Maybe I'm wrong but Bash as /bin/sh is:
> $ ls -l /bin/sh
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 May 12 18:35 /bin/sh -> bashAh yes, I keep forgetting that bash behaves differently when invoked as 'sh'. (i.e. it enters 'posix mode' in this case).
Indeed, this is (roughly) equivalent to:
$ bash --posix t6006-rev-list-format.sh ok 1 - setup ok 2 - format percent ok 3 - format hash ... ok 52 - oneline with empty message ok 53 - single-character name is parsed correctly # passed all 53 test(s) 1..53 $
... which works.
Thanks again.
ATB Ramsay Jones