Re: [PATCH 5/7] enforce `xfuncname` precedence over `funcname`

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jul 25, 2014, 17:09 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqr41974cl.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <vpqlhriyll6.fsf@anie.imag.fr>

Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 7/25/2014 2:52 AM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>> However, I think it you could create a list of <pointer to hash-table
>>> entry, string-list index> pairs in the config_set and use that to do
>>> the iteration. A bit ugly, but it should work.
>>
>> Thanks for the advice, that is exactly what I am doing.
>
> I'd just replace "list" with "array" and use
> Documentation/technical/api-allocation-growing.txt.
>
> But I can't think of a better way.

Presumably this array will reflect the order the source file told us about the keys and their values; I wonder if the <filename, lineno> information we already have can be used (or unified) with it?

Is the "when the last variable in a section disappears, make the section header go away, with sensible handling of comments around it" part of this GSoC project? If so, I suspect that the feature would also want to know where things appear in the original file, so this data structure may play a role there, too.