Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] builtin/repo: include largest object information
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 2, 2026, 22:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqqzq1yjcl.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20260302214526.2034279-1-jltobler@gmail.com>
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Changes from V2: > - When checking for largest objects, zero valued objects were not > recorded even if they were the "largest" object. In this version, if > an object ID has not been recorded yet, it is always added even if its > value is zero. > - Added some helper functions for printing keyvalue info to cut down on > duplicate code and hopefully make it a bit easier on the eyes. > - Moved the for-each loop that printed table OID annoations inside the > preceding if-block making it a bit easier to reason about.
The changes I see in the diff relative to the previous iteration all look sane to me. Will replace. Thanks.