Re: [PATCH 0/8] object_id part 2
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 11, 2015, 00:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpp53gkmq.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150611000251.GB786544@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:51:14PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:50:32PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes: >> > > Convert struct object to object_id >> > >> > It seems that the last one didn't make it... >> >> It appears the mail was too large for vger. Unfortunately for >> bisectability reasons, it is necessarily large. I'll resubmit the patch >> with less context. > > Unfortunately, the only patch I can generate that falls under to 100 KB > limit is with -U0, which isn't very useful. How do you want to proceed? > The branch is available at [0], or I can send the -U0 patch, or I can > split it into unbisectable pieces. > > [0] https://github.com/bk2204/git.git object-id-part2
No approach other than just letting reviewers fetch from there and taking a look is reasonable, I would think.
Did you create this manually, or is it a mechanical scripted rewrite followed by manual clean-up? If the latter, it may help people by posting the mechanical recipe _and_ a patch that shows the manual clean-up. That is something we can reasonably review and discuss.