Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2022, 23:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpmmptns6.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqmthxbcv2.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Hmph, this seems to make one test fail. > > t5801-remote-helpers.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 31 Failed: 4) > Failed tests: 14-16, 31 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Files=1, Tests=31, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 1.40 cusr 1.62 csys = 3.06 CPU) > Result: FAIL
False alarm. This byitself, or merged to 'seen' with other random topics, no longer seem to break these tests.