Re: [PATCH] push: fix --force-if-includes when remote-tracking ref has no reflog

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sep 4, 2026, 16:48 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqpkyt3qul.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <20260903200015.36849-1-f@lex.la>

Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> writes:

Show 7 quoted lines

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> your sign-off must be the last line in the trailers.
>
> I took Assisted-by from the kernel, which asks for it. I could not find
> anything either way in git's guidelines, so I followed the kernel. I will
> put the sign-off last in v2, and drop Assisted-by if you would rather not
> have it.

We are not the kernel ;-)

Quite honestly, I would rather not have patches filled with AI slop that is often walls of text filled with "eh, that may not be wrong per-se, but is it relevant?" descriptions and we can never tell what was used as the original material to copy from. I prefer patches with human-readable explanations and known origin.

Thanks.