Re: [PATCH 3/4] bisect: simplify the add of new bisect terms
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2015, 16:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqoaknmtlw.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqvbevr3eh.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > >> But I do not think it is a good idea to penalize the normal case by >> writing the terms file and reading them back from it when the user >> is bisecting with good/bad in the first place, so.... > > No strong opinion on that, but creating one file doesn't cost much, and > one advantage of writing it unconditionally is that it unifies bad/good > and old/new more in the code. Just the creation of BISECT_TERMS becomes > a special-case.
You have to handle that case anyway when I start bisection, which is going to take very long and I had to leave for the day to come back the next day to continue, and during the night the sysadmin updates the installed version of Git.