Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] bisect: add the terms old/new
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2015, 21:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqoakni8da.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1433953472-32572-4-git-send-email-antoine.delaite@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
Antoine Delaite <antoine.delaite@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Related discussions: > > - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/86063 > introduced bisect fix unfixed to find fix. > - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/182398 > discussion around bisect yes/no or old/new. > - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/199758 > last discussion and reviews
Hmph, recent reviews and discussions we had here do not count?
I do agree with Matthieu's review on the last round, which is still not quite addressed in this round. The current code only supports good/bad and this series merely adds another hardcoded pair old/new, which is disappointing, given that this is a very good opportunity to place an infrastructure to allow other pairs like unfixed/fixed building on top of the most generic old/new.