Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] bisect: add the terms old/new
- From
- Louis-Alexandre Stuber <stuberl@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2015, 11:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <230275426.551398.1434282670067.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqoakni8da.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
I agree this makes no sense hardcoding old/new once bisect terms is considerred. It would have been a lot better if we had started implementing bisect terms immediatly (but we thought old/new would already be an appreciable step for most of users).