Re: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for git

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2016, 18:05 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqoa2ehp5u.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kYTwsWy+oxnPKghWKGLEaO9qWZbrQOOejeEBOe0c-o0Pg@mail.gmail.com>

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:

> I do it most of the time, but I did not start managing it.
> And I have been pretty lax/liberal about handing out rights to do stuff,
> because I did not want to tip on anyone's toes giving to few rights
> and thereby annoying them.

Good to know that you have been managing it; I was mostly worried about not having anybody managing it (i.e. imagining Coverity nominated/volunteered me as manager with everybody else as viewers) and the new viewer requests get totally ignored by the project as the whole.

> I see that some of these emails may be inconvenient to you, I can
> change your role to defect viewer/contributor if you prefer.

It is not a huge inconvenience to me, because any piece of e-mail that is addressed directly to gitster@ without CC'ing to git@vger and is not a follow-up to any earlier message goes to a separate lowest-priority mailbox that I rarely look at. But if it is easy to recategorize me, please do so.

Thanks.