Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] lazyload.h: use an even more generic function pointer than FARPROC

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sep 27, 2021, 20:13 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqo88dpyiz.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAPUEspif_MAg1==aNWT4q1spOFbsp0cUfr+JjPdc2RLy4F4L1A@mail.gmail.com>

Carlo Arenas <carenas@gmail.com> writes:

Show 14 quoted lines

> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:35 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón  <carenas@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Because of the way the function declaration was done in the previous
>> > patch the order of variables that use it had to be adjusted so that
>> > it is the last variable declared, as well.
>>
>> Is it clear to everybody what this paragraph is referring to?  It is
>> not, at least to me.
>
> It is not, and it is no longer needed after the fixup was applied to
> the previous
> patch.

Ah, yes, the previous one's definition is quite awkward because you had to omit the terminating ';' to use it.

I'll drop the paragraph with "commit --amend".

THanks.