Re: [GSoC][RFC PATCH 0/6] Add --subject-extra-prefix flag to format-patch
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 5, 2025, 02:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqo6ygmdst.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <7350D94E-39DC-4C9B-926A-3FA2A4C76687@gmail.com>
Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Once you stop treating [GSoC] as if it is an independent prefix, >> everything will fall into place naturally without adding anything >> extra. > > So, instead of changing the behavior of format-patch, would it be > better if we changed the documentation to ask these patches to be > sent with `[GSoC PATCH]` or similar instead of `[GSoC][PATCH]`?
Yup, I do not know offhand who are managing these descriptions, but having extra moniker in the same [square bracket] as PATCH is a more common practice, and we should follow suit.
Thanks.