From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 02:06:26 GMT Subject: Re: [GSoC][RFC PATCH 0/6] Add --subject-extra-prefix flag to format-patch Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7350D94E-39DC-4C9B-926A-3FA2A4C76687@gmail.com> Lucas Seiki Oshiro writes: >> Once you stop treating [GSoC] as if it is an independent prefix, >> everything will fall into place naturally without adding anything >> extra. > > So, instead of changing the behavior of format-patch, would it be > better if we changed the documentation to ask these patches to be > sent with `[GSoC PATCH]` or similar instead of `[GSoC][PATCH]`? Yup, I do not know offhand who are managing these descriptions, but having extra moniker in the same [square bracket] as PATCH is a more common practice, and we should follow suit. Thanks.