Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] replace: add --graft option
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 11, 2014, 14:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmwcg561j.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP8UFD0_m5aFVcBQr3d9pXR=9rLjAVPGrj=UsBYFcnTQFwNKGA@mail.gmail.com>
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > >>> "Making sure A's parent is B" would be an >>> idempotent operation, no? Why not just make sure A's parent is >>> already B and report "Your wish has been granted" to the user? > > ... and here you say we should report "your wish has been granted"...
Normal way for "git replace" to report that is to exit with status 0 and without any noise, I would think.
Show 8 quoted lines
>>> Why would it be simpler for the user to get an error, inspect the >>> situation and realize that his wish has been granted after all? > > ... but for me reporting to the user "your wish has been granted" and > warning (or errorring out) saying "the new commit would be the same as > the old one" are nearly the same thing. > > So I wonder what exactly you are not happy with.
See above.