Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] replace: add --graft option
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 11, 2014, 16:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD2db=ZMFSvzW6be3gBv7DP93C7Z5yfOEhs9QLNOkX0fGQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqmwcg561j.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> >>>> "Making sure A's parent is B" would be an >>>> idempotent operation, no? Why not just make sure A's parent is >>>> already B and report "Your wish has been granted" to the user? >> >> ... and here you say we should report "your wish has been granted"... > > Normal way for "git replace" to report that is to exit with status 0 > and without any noise, I would think.
In a similar case "git replace --edit" we error out instead of just exiting (with status 0), see:
f22166b5fee7dc (replace: make sure --edit results in a different object)