Re: [RFC] [PATCH] remote: add new --fetch option for set-url
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2014, 23:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmw75ligb.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4081616.27DjsMG0kb@al>
Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl> writes:
Show 23 quoted lines
> On Saturday 29 November 2014 13:31:18 Philip Oakley wrote: >> From: "Peter Wu" <peter@lekensteyn.nl> >> > Ok, I will make a clear note about the default (without --only) >> > behavior >> > having weird behavior for historical reasons. Are you really OK with >> > --only=both? It sounds a bit odd (mathematically speaking it is >> > correct >> > as fetch and push are both partitions that form the whole set if you >> > ignore the historical behavior). >> > >> How about : >> >> s/--only/--direction/ >> >> or some suitable abbreviation (--dirn ?) > > In the next version of the patch I went for three separate options, > --fetch, --push and --both: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/260213 > (Juno, Jeff: ping?) > > The option --direction=<fetch|push|both> is a bit longer and --dirn can > be mistaken for "directory N".
If we have to have three variants, --{fetch,push,both} would be the easiest to understand among the possibilities listed above, I would think.