Re: [RFC] [PATCH] remote: add new --fetch option for set-url
- From
Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2014, 17:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4081616.27DjsMG0kb@al>
- In-Reply-To
- <D7697DE2C591421E8588920BD4FE0455@PhilipOakley>
On Saturday 29 November 2014 13:31:18 Philip Oakley wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> From: "Peter Wu" <peter@lekensteyn.nl> > > Ok, I will make a clear note about the default (without --only) > > behavior > > having weird behavior for historical reasons. Are you really OK with > > --only=both? It sounds a bit odd (mathematically speaking it is > > correct > > as fetch and push are both partitions that form the whole set if you > > ignore the historical behavior). > > > How about : > > s/--only/--direction/ > > or some suitable abbreviation (--dirn ?)
In the next version of the patch I went for three separate options, --fetch, --push and --both: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/260213 (Juno, Jeff: ping?)
The option --direction=<fetch|push|both> is a bit longer and --dirn can be mistaken for "directory N".
-- Kind regards, Peter https://lekensteyn.nl