Re: aw/t9811-modernize, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2025, #04; Tue, 15)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Apr 18, 2025, 21:44 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqmscd9mbl.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtt6l9mlj.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> So I don't know if git-p4 got smarter, or what. But we should probably
>> back out at least that part of the commit until we figure out what's
>> going on (where "we" is somebody who cares a lot more about p4 than I
>> do).
>
> Yes, and there was another breakage in that 2-hunk patch in the
> other hunk I sent out a fix for a few minutes ago.

We seem to have quite a many ubuntu/linux test jobs, none of which failed due to the obvious syntax error in t9811, which probalby means we are not running p4 tests at all on any of our Linux jobs.