Re: [PATCH 3/3] builtin/maintenance: fix loose objects task emitting pack hash
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 20, 2024, 15:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqle0rb2zy.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZsRIHS0mFZaRHFVc@tanuki>
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> I certainly appreciate the discussion, thanks for chiming in! I'm still > not convinced that we should continue to couple auto-maintenance and > backgrounding to each other. In my opinion, this behaviour was a mistake > in the past and continues to surprise now, too. Making it an explicit > option feels more natural to me. > > That being said, when others feel strongly about this, as well, then I'm > of course happy to adapt.
FWIW, I find it is a sensible approach to have a separate "run in the background" that is not strongly tied to "do your thing if you think the repository really needs it".
Thanks.