Re: [PATCH v3] t9001: avoid not portable '\n' with sed
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2014, 05:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk38pb95s.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <5396849F.7060206@web.de>
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
> t9001 used a '\n' in a sed expression to split one line into two lines, > but the usage of '\n' in the "replacement string" is not portable.
This looks peculiarly familiar; don't I already have it queued?