From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:55:43 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] t9001: avoid not portable '\n' with sed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5396849F.7060206@web.de> Torsten Bögershausen writes: > t9001 used a '\n' in a sed expression to split one line into two lines, > but the usage of '\n' in the "replacement string" is not portable. This looks peculiarly familiar; don't I already have it queued?