Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] t4013: call git-merge instead of git-pull
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 7, 2015, 17:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk2wkqpc9.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <a2c6df723ca5237c094ab4002e45a834@www.dscho.org>
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Both this patch and 9/12 change `git pull` invocations to equivalent > non-pull ones, but I wonder whether it would not be a better idea to > leave them as-are, so that we can make sure that scripts out there > that might use similar `git pull` invocations would be unaffected by > the rewrite?
Yes. I do not mind changing t4013 that is not about testing 'git pull' to lose 'git pull . other-branch', but then we would want to have a corresponding test somewhere in the test script that is about testing 'git pull' to cover that (ancient) pattern of use.
Thanks.