Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] t5524: test --log=1 limits shortlog length
- From
Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 7, 2015, 17:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACRoPnRfqQMRJ5N=oL84SMw=FC=Eg-Co-De_9E9cpWCaaSZAxw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <05adfac12cb9a7ad183281974d991e00@www.dscho.org>
Hi Dscho,
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Hi Paul, > > On 2015-05-07 10:44, Paul Tan wrote: >> @@ -32,4 +35,18 @@ test_expect_success pull ' >> ) >> ' >> >> +test_expect_failure '--log=1 limits shortlog length' ' >> +( >> + cd cloned && >> + git reset --hard HEAD^ && >> + test `cat afile` = original && >> + test `cat bfile` = added && >> + git pull --log && >> + git log -3 && >> + git cat-file commit HEAD >result && >> + grep Dollar result && >> + ! grep "second commit" result >> +) > > I think it might be better to use `test_must_fail` here, just for consistency (the `!` operator would also pass if `grep` itself could not be executed correctly, quite academic, I know, given that `grep` is exercised plenty of times by the test suite, but still...) > > What do you think?
Yep, it's definitely better. Sometimes I forget about the existence of some test utility functions :-/.
Thanks, Paul