Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] t5520: test for failure if index has unresolved entries

> A couple very minor comments applying to the entire patch series...
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Commit d38a30df (Be more user-friendly when refusing to do something
>> because of conflict) introduced code paths to git-pull which will error
>
> Custom for citing a commit is also to include the date:
>
>     d38a30df (Be more user-friendly...conflict, 2010-01-12)
>
> Some people use this git alias to help automate:
>
>     whatis = show -s --pretty='tformat:%h (%s, %ad)' --date=short

>> diff --git a/t/t5520-pull.sh b/t/t5520-pull.sh
>> index 5add900..37ff45f 100755
>> --- a/t/t5520-pull.sh
>> +++ b/t/t5520-pull.sh
>> @@ -164,6 +164,27 @@ test_expect_success 'fail if upstream branch does not exist' '
>>         test `cat file` = file
>>  '
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'fail if the index has unresolved entries' '
>> +       git checkout -b third master^ &&
>> +       test_when_finished "git checkout -f copy && git branch -D third" &&
>> +       echo file >expected &&
>> +       test_cmp expected file &&
>> +       echo modified2 >file &&
>> +       git commit -a -m modified2 &&
>> +       test -z "$(git ls-files -u)" &&
>> +       test_must_fail git pull . second &&
>> +       test -n "$(git ls-files -u)" &&
>> +       cp file expected &&
>> +       test_must_fail git pull . second 2>out &&
>
> Perhaps call this stderr capture file 'err' rather than 'out' to
> clarify its nature and to distinguish it from a stdout capture which
> someone might add in the future?