Re: [PATCH] t7300: mark test with SANITY
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2016, 21:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk2jalu03.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160503211528.GA32737@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Maybe. I admit to not really using the Travis tests myself, as they are > way too slow and cumbersome to debug compared to just running "make > test". The primary value to me of centralized CI is: > > 1. _If_ people are looking at PRs on GitHub, the test status is shown > right there in the PR, without a reviewer having to wonder whether > the submitter ran "make test". But since I don't ever look at PRs > for Git, that's not helpful.
What I was hoping was that bots like SubmitGit could look at that status.
Show 5 quoted lines
> 2. Quicker testing on a variety of platforms that I don't have. > > ... I think > there was some discussion in the 0day thread elsewhere on the list, > but I didn't follow it too closely.
Yes, I'd love to see it happen some day.
Show 5 quoted lines
> Anyway, back to the original question. I do think "test as root" can be > considered another platform, which makes it a good match for CI. But at > the same time, I don't know that it has ever surfaced an actual bug in > _Git_, and not just the test suite. So seeing those bugs quickly is a > lot less interesting.
True.