Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2018, 21:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk1vzrp0l.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <BEE9E5DB-AB1A-4119-90E6-700186739C59@gmail.com>
Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> writes:
> "false". Therefore, "is_missing_required_utf_bom()" might be > lengthy but should fit.
Thanks, sounds understandable a lot better than the original ;-)