From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:54:34 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Lars Schneider writes: > "false". Therefore, "is_missing_required_utf_bom()" might be > lengthy but should fit. Thanks, sounds understandable a lot better than the original ;-)