Re: [PATCH 0/6] Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.74
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 2, 2020, 16:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk12x4yvb.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200402004533.GA6369@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> I believe Emacs does have good integration with the info format. I > personally prefer documentation in almost any other format and would > also be happy to see it go away, but Emacs users may find it convenient. > > Junio, I believe you use Emacs. Do you have an opinion on whether, on > the whole, Emacs users are likely to make good use of the info > documentation?
I probably am very atypical; I used to read even system manuals via info in Emacs, but for the last 10 years or more, I don't. Another reason that makes me a bad judge is because I do not use our doc in any formatted form---"git grep -e ... Documentation/" is easier and faster. So, no, I have no opinion.
> If nobody seems to care very much for the info documentation, we could > drop it. I've put a query out on Twitter to see if anyone I know is > using it.
Thanks.