git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.74

From
MÅMartin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 31, 2020, 19:26 UTC
Message-ID
<20200331192600.588-1-martin.agren@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20200330094513.GB1735224@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 11:45, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote:
>
> Yay, I'm very happy to see this series. I'd be happy to go even further
> if there's some benefit, but I think this removes the last of the
> Makefile knobs.

Yes, I should have been clear about that: This does remove the last Makefile knob. At least I couldn't find any more with some browsing and grepping.

Show 13 quoted lines
> > After this series, user-manual.conf still refers to older docbook-xsl
> > versions. The proper fix there might be to actually be a bit more
> > aggressive and drop that hunk, making the rendered docs prettier.
> > There's some history there, including mentions of texinfo, which is
> > outside my comfort zone. I've got work in progress there, but I'd rather
> > submit that separately from these "expected no-op" patches.
>
> Yeah, dropping that bit from user-manual.conf seems reasonable. That
> shouldn't show anything in doc-diff because it's not installed with the
> manpages. And the HTML build wouldn't use docbook. I installed the
> zillion packages needed to build user-manual.pdf. The behavior without
> that block looks significantly nicer (the example blocks are actually
> shaded).
This matches what I've seen.
> Anyway, that was just for my own curiosity. If you've got further work
> in that area and prefer to do it as a separate series, that's fine by
> me.

Not sure about "further work" really. I'm pretty sure you tried out the exact same diff that I have, and I'm glad you agree it looks prettier / "significantly nicer". A small part of why I didn't submit it is that it's user manual vs man pages. Another part is that it's an intentional change as opposed to an intended no-op.

But most importantly: When I looked into the history, I came upon c2a7f5d438 ("docs: monospace listings in docbook output", 2012-08-07), which made me worry about breaking "make info". On second thought, I might have broken it many times already over the past few years, since I've never built the info. So maybe worrying about that all of a sudden is a bit unfounded in a way. :-/

(I tried to build "info" while working on this. It works in the sense that it doesn't error out, but I don't get anything that looks remotely useful. I've never used info at all though, to be honest, so could be missing something fundamental.)

Here's what I have. I suppose it could be framed as a patch 1/7 instead.
Martin
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH 7/6?] user-manual.conf: don't specify [listingblock]

This is the config file we use when we build the user manual with AsciiDoc. The comment at the top of this chunk that we're removing says the following:

  "unbreak" docbook-xsl v1.68 for manpages (sic!). v1.69 works with or
  without this.

This comes from d19fbc3c17 ("Documentation: add git user's manual", 2007-01-07), where it looks like this conf file in general and this snippet in particular was copy-pasted from asciidoc.conf.

This chunk is very similar to something we just got rid of for the manpages, and because this appears to be aimed at v1.68 -- which we no longer support for the manpages as of a few commits ago --, it's tempting to get rid of this. That reveals an interesting aspect of "works with or without this": it turns out it actually works /better/ without!

Dropping this makes us render code snippets and shell listings using <screen> rather than <literallayout>, just like Asciidoctor does. In user-manual.pdf, this puts the contents into dimmed-background, easy-to-distinguish-from-the-surrounding-text boxes, as opposed to white-background (transparent) boxes.

Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/user-manual.conf | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.conf b/Documentation/user-manual.conf
index d87294de2f..0148f126dc 100644
--- a/Documentation/user-manual.conf
+++ b/Documentation/user-manual.conf
@@ -9,13 +9,3 @@ tilde=&#126;
 
 [linkgit-inlinemacro]
 <ulink url="{target}.html">{target}{0?({0})}</ulink>
-
-ifdef::backend-docbook[]
-# "unbreak" docbook-xsl v1.68 for manpages. v1.69 works with or without this.
-[listingblock]
-<example><title>{title}</title>
-<literallayout class="monospaced">
-|
-</literallayout>
-{title#}</example>
-endif::backend-docbook[]
Previous: Jeff KingNext: Jeff King
Message 11 of 16 in “Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.74”
  1. 0/6 Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.74Martin Ågren, Mar 29, 2020
  2. 1/6 Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.71.1Martin Ågren, Mar 29, 2020
  3. 2/6 Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.72.0Martin Ågren, Mar 29, 2020
  4. 3/6 Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.73.0Martin Ågren, Mar 29, 2020
  5. 4/6 manpage-bold-literal.xsl: stop using git.docbook.backslashMartin Ågren, Mar 29, 2020
  6. 5/6 manpage-normal.xsl: fold in manpage-base.xslMartin Ågren, Mar 29, 2020
  7. 6/6 INSTALL: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.74Martin Ågren, Mar 29, 2020
  8. Jeff KingMar 30, 2020
  9. Junio C HamanoMar 29, 2020
  10. Jeff KingMar 30, 2020
  11. Martin ÅgrenMar 31, 2020
  12. Jeff KingApr 1, 2020
  13. Junio C HamanoApr 1, 2020
  14. brian m. carlsonApr 2, 2020
  15. Junio C HamanoApr 2, 2020
  16. brian m. carlsonMar 30, 2020

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.