Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] git-credential-netrc: better symbolic port names support

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jun 25, 2025, 00:24 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqikkkzmzr.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <87ikkkk84f.fsf@terra.mail-host-address-is-not-set>

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim@guixotic.coop> writes:

Show 18 quoted lines

> Hi,
>
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> v2 and this iteration both have all messages set as replies to a
>> single message in the old thread.
>>
>> Please make sure in your future submissions:
>>
>>  - [0/n] is a reply to [0/m] of the previous iteration.
>>
>>  - [1/n], [2/n], ... and [n/n] are all replies to [0/n] of the same
>>    iteration.
>
> OK. This means I need to submit with 'git send-email' in two steps,
> right?

I do not think so. Find description of the "--in-reply-to" option in the documentation, and read about interactions with "--thread" and "--no-chain-reply-to" there?

    So for example when `--thread` and `--no-chain-reply-to` are specified, the
    second and subsequent patches will be replies to the first one like in the
    illustration below where `[PATCH v2 0/3]` is in reply to `[PATCH 0/2]`:

      [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did...
        [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests
        [PATCH 2/2] Implementation
        [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll
          [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up
          [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests
          [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation