Re: [PATCH 1/2] run-parallel: rename set_nonblocking to set_nonblocking_or_die
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 5, 2015, 06:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqfv0l7z2r.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <563AF229.1060302@web.de>
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
> (Jumping into an old discussion, I may be off topic)
I think this is exactly the latest "I wonder" from Peff, to which I said "well, perhaps we didn't need nonblock after all from the beginning".
Show 5 quoted lines
> And this work regardless if the fd blocking or not, so from that point of view, > the set_nonblocking() is not needed at all. > > The major question is, if the poll() works under Windows, (and I > haven't found time to dig further)
;-)