Re: git.git as of tonight
- From
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
- Date
- Nov 2, 2015, 21:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5637D266.4060904@kdbg.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqpoztf6ok.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Am 02.11.2015 um 03:58 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Show 23 quoted lines
> * sb/submodule-parallel-fetch (2015-10-21) 14 commits > (merged to 'next' on 2015-10-23 at 8f04bbd) > + run-command: fix missing output from late callbacks > + test-run-command: increase test coverage > + test-run-command: test for gracefully aborting > + run-command: initialize the shutdown flag > + run-command: clear leftover state from child_process structure > + run-command: fix early shutdown > (merged to 'next' on 2015-10-15 at df63590) > + submodules: allow parallel fetching, add tests and documentation > + fetch_populated_submodules: use new parallel job processing > + run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor > + sigchain: add command to pop all common signals > + strbuf: add strbuf_read_once to read without blocking > + xread_nonblock: add functionality to read from fds without blocking > + xread: poll on non blocking fds > + submodule.c: write "Fetching submodule <foo>" to stderr > (this branch is used by rs/daemon-leak-fix and sb/submodule-parallel-update.) > > Add a framework to spawn a group of processes in parallel, and use > it to run "git fetch --recurse-submodules" in parallel. > > Will merge to 'master'.
Please don't, yet. This series does not build on Windows:
run-command.c: In function 'set_nonblocking': run-command.c:1011: error: 'F_GETFL' undeclared (first use in this function) run-command.c:1011: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once run-command.c:1011: error: for each function it appears in.) run-command.c:1015: error: 'F_SETFL' undeclared (first use in this function) run-command.c:1015: error: 'O_NONBLOCK' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [run-command.o] Error 1
I have to investigate whether we can have some sort of Posixy non-blocking IO on Windows or whether we have to opt-out from this parallel-process facility. Any help from Windows experts would be appreciated.
-- Hannes