From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:14:04 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] run-parallel: rename set_nonblocking to set_nonblocking_or_die Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <563AF229.1060302@web.de> Torsten Bögershausen writes: > (Jumping into an old discussion, I may be off topic) I think this is exactly the latest "I wonder" from Peff, to which I said "well, perhaps we didn't need nonblock after all from the beginning". > And this work regardless if the fd blocking or not, so from that point of view, > the set_nonblocking() is not needed at all. > > The major question is, if the poll() works under Windows, (and I > haven't found time to dig further) ;-)