Re: [PATCH 1/2] for_each_bisect_ref(): don't trim refnames
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> Since we obviously don't have even a single test for "--bisect", that
>> might be worth adding.
>
> It turns out we do, but none that actually check that we use the default
> refnames. So maybe squash this in?
Show 24 quoted lines
>
> diff --git a/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh b/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
> index 3bf2759ea..534903bbd 100755
> --- a/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
> +++ b/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
> @@ -235,4 +235,18 @@ test_sequence "--bisect"
>
> #
> #
> +
> +test_expect_success '--bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
> + git update-ref refs/bisect/bad c3 &&
> + good=$(git rev-parse b1) &&
> + git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
> + good=$(git rev-parse c1) &&
> + git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
> +
> + # the only thing between c3 and c1 is c2
> + git rev-parse c2 >expect &&
> + git rev-list --bisect >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
> test_done
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>