Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] i18n: tag.c factorize i18n strings
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 28, 2021, 00:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqee5xvb13.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <211228.86wnjpip1i.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Does it really matter? I.e. we've got plenty of options parsing code in > various places that might complain about issues A and B with your > command-line, but will only emit one of those at a time. > ... > But until such an improvement something as trivial as minimizing the > diff size (i.e. not needing "if" -> "else if") seems preferrable to > slavishly maintaining compatibility with the exact sequence of errors > we'd emit before.
The patch is already touching every other line. Making the change into a replacement of solid block into another solid block would probably make the resulting patch easier to read.
And by doing so, the submitter demonstrates to reviewers that they _care_, as such an attention to detail is a sign that the submitter thought the ramifications of changing an early die() into an assignment that keeps going.
So, yes, it does matter.