Re: [PATCH 00/10] Factorization of messages with similar meaning
- From
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
- Date
- Dec 5, 2021, 19:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <96b2d1c2-895d-6196-df8d-ee1e9b6107ce@kdbg.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <8718669.4XknugNGDb@cayenne>
Am 05.12.21 um 18:25 schrieb Jean-Noël AVILA:
> If needed, "%s and %s are mutually exclusive" could be turned into > "options %s and %s are mutually exclusive" to make it clear that the > placeholders can only hold option names.
IMO, being less terse helps not only translators, but also users.
Regarding this particular message, personally, I am not a fan of "mutually exclusive" (sounds like it's been taken from a law text). How about "options ... are incompatible" or "... cannot be used together"?
-- Hannes