Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsck: handle bad trees like other errors
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 26, 2016, 20:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqd1jqqv3o.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqh992qv9a.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> To prevent further headaches in this directory, can we have > .gitattributes that tells us that everything in there are binary > files? Something like the attached. > > The other object was transferred as a binary patch, but I have no > faith in what I applied from your e-mail message for this file that > went though latin-1 to utf-8 conversion X-<. > > t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes b/t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..a173f27 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +[0-9a-f]*[0-9a-f] -diff
I suspect that the t/t1007 directory in 1/2 may deserve a similar treatment.