Re: Git trademark status and policy
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 17, 2018, 13:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqd0tc9qek.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180917032101.GD22024@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> (Also, to be clear, this is all _only_ about "Git Cola". The "git-cola" > command is explicitly OK in the policy because that's how commands > work).
These match my understanding. Thanks for spelling them out. That project is an example of being a good ecosystem citizen whose name we were happy to grand-father while discussing the trademark policy.
I can undertand the sentiment that we may not want to appear drawing lines among friends, but ultimately the policy is about protecting our friends from non-friends, so whether we like it or not, we may have to be more explicit about who's grandfathered and who's not than before.