Re: Git trademark status and policy
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 21, 2017, 22:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170221223113.ibtnngj3dwbtovs7@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAAj3zPzrD+R6kDdqR3C7aYTDjaE+Y5zN+MfoXe5EuH4ZPxroHA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:55:15AM -0800, G. Sylvie Davies wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Is "Gitter" allowed? (https://gitter.im/). > > More info here: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitter > > Also, their twitter handle is @gitchat. > > Not sure I'd even classify "gitter" as a portmanteau.
I don't think the Git committee has discussed that one. I'll mention it there.
I wouldn't get hung up on the "is it a strict portmanteau" question. I think the more important question is whether it creates confusion about endorsement or interoperability. The portmanteau thing is more of a rule of thumb there. (That's all IMHO, of course, and not an official statement of the committee).
-Peff