Re: [Patch v1 3/3] t5562: replace /dev/zero with a pipe from generate_zero_bytes
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 13, 2019, 17:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqd0nvd2h5.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <f3b506bb-52eb-3a1f-ba3d-0cf327271ab2@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Am 12.02.19 um 18:24 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>>> diff --git a/t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh b/t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh
>>>> @@ -143,14 +143,14 @@ test_expect_success GZIP 'push gzipped empty' '
>>>> test_expect_success 'CONTENT_LENGTH overflow ssite_t' '
>>>> NOT_FIT_IN_SSIZE=$(ssize_b100dots) &&
>>>> - env \
>>>> + generate_zero_bytes infinity | env \
>>>> CONTENT_TYPE=application/x-git-upload-pack-request \
>>>> QUERY_STRING=/repo.git/git-upload-pack \
>>>> PATH_TRANSLATED="$PWD"/.git/git-upload-pack \
>>>> GIT_HTTP_EXPORT_ALL=TRUE \
>>>> REQUEST_METHOD=POST \
>>>> CONTENT_LENGTH="$NOT_FIT_IN_SSIZE" \
>>>> - git http-backend </dev/zero >/dev/null 2>err &&
>>>> + git http-backend >/dev/null 2>err &&
>>
>> Doesn't this "inifinity" mode have the same issue that was worked
>> around by 6129c930 ("test-lib: limit the output of the yes utility",
>> 2016-02-02) on Windows? If I read correctly, the process upstream
>> of the pipe (in this case, perl producing a stream of infinite NULs)
>> would not die when the downstream stops reading with SIGPIPE.
>
> I think we do not have to worry, and the reason is that the
> justification for 6129c930 is simply wrong.That's kinda surprising but in a pleasant way---it's good that we have one less thing we need to worry about.
Thanks.
Show 9 quoted lines
> > As I did not find the patch series discussed here to pull and test, I > repeated the timing tests with t7610-mergetool.sh with and without > 6129c930 reverted, and the difference is only in the noise. The reason > t7610 takes so long on Windows looks more like a consequence of the > 10,000 processes that it spawns. It is a mystery to me how I came to the > conclusion that the change in 6129c930 would make a difference. :-( > > -- Hannes