Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests: make sure nested lazy prereqs work reliably
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> I took a look at converting some of the existing tests. This seems to
> work. It's a bit longer to read, perhaps, but I kind of like that the
> expected outcome is all laid out. It also pollutes the test output less
> (e.g., if you wanted to count up skipped tests in the whole suite, you'd
> get a bunch of noise from t0000 for these uninteresting skips).
>
> Thoughts? I think this is something I'd do on top of your patch.
Yes, it looks nice as the expectation is expressed much clearly.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>