Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] worktree: Support `--orphan` when creating new worktrees

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: May 1, 2023, 21:51 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqcz3j4t68.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <wk2wpftowc7wqeaqrylxq7eci4bkmuffwu75h4qugxulcgsk2b@gw6ouq3g5g2j>

Jacob Abel <jacobabel@nullpo.dev> writes:

Show 25 quoted lines

> I've noticed on the lore that this revision didn't continue the existing
> thread[1] for the patchset. It seems this is because the `In-Reply-To`
> header was stripped from the message due to a bug with the MTA/mail bridge
> I use on my dev machine [2].
>
> Apologies for any confusion this may have caused.
>
> For continuity purposes I can either:
>
> A. RESEND the revision to the main thread with a note in the cover letter
> tagging the discussions from this thread so far.
>
> B. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then
> eventually publish v10 in reply to that reply message in the main thread.
>
> C. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then
> eventually publish v10 in reply to this cover letter.
>
> Let me know which would be the least disruptive/most ideal way forward or
> if there is another way I should approach this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230109173227.29264-1-jacobabel@nullpo.dev/
> 2. https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge/issues/374

Once the thread is broken, it is broken. You gave a link in the message I am responding to, to make it easier for people to go back to earlier iterations and that is good enough, I think.

Your eventual v10 can be sent with its cover set as a reply to the cover of v9 and we will be fine.

It seems that we may need another iteration, but if I reclal correctly what remains are all minor issues?

Thanks.